KEDAR RAM AND ORS. vs CHANDAN KUMAR AND ORS. — 6/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Mislaneous
CNR: BRBJ120000682025
Filing Number
68/2025
Filing Date
17-Feb-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
17-Feb-2025
Court
Jagdishpur Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub Judge-I
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KEDAR RAM AND ORS.
Adv. Kumar Saurabh
-
2.VIKASH RAM
-
3.BABAN RAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHANDAN KUMAR AND ORS.
-
2.NANDAN KUMAR
-
3.TAPSYA SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Sub-Judge I Court at Jagdishpur, Bhojpur allowed a miscellaneous petition under CPC Section 151 to restore original case No. 391/2021, which had been dismissed on 07.01.2025 when the plaintiff failed to appear. The court found the petitioner's explanation regarding non-appearance due to illness and lack of notice credible after he appeared and gave sworn testimony on 29.08.2025, and restored the case for proper continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge-I
-
27-Jan-2026
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
07-Nov-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
06-Nov-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
29-Aug-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
12-Jun-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
14-May-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
02-May-2025
Stistedar Report
Sub Judge-I
-
02-Apr-2025
Stistedar Report
-
04-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2025
The Sub-Judge I Court at Jagdishpur, Bhojpur allowed a miscellaneous petition under CPC Section 151 to restore original case No. 391/2021, which had been dismissed on 07.01.2025 when the plaintiff failed to appear. The court found the petitioner's explanation regarding non-appearance due to illness and lack of notice credible after he appeared and gave sworn testimony on 29.08.2025, and restored the case for proper continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts