KEDAR RAM AND ORS. vs CHANDAN KUMAR AND ORS. — 6/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Mislaneous

CNR: BRBJ120000682025

Filing Number

68/2025

Filing Date

17-Feb-2025

Registration No

6/2025

Registration Date

17-Feb-2025

Court

Jagdishpur Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub Judge-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KEDAR RAM AND ORS.

    Adv. Kumar Saurabh

  2. 2.VIKASH RAM

  3. 3.BABAN RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDAN KUMAR AND ORS.

  2. 2.NANDAN KUMAR

  3. 3.TAPSYA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sub-Judge I Court at Jagdishpur, Bhojpur allowed a miscellaneous petition under CPC Section 151 to restore original case No. 391/2021, which had been dismissed on 07.01.2025 when the plaintiff failed to appear. The court found the petitioner's explanation regarding non-appearance due to illness and lack of notice credible after he appeared and gave sworn testimony on 29.08.2025, and restored the case for proper continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge-I

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Sub Judge-I

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Sub Judge-I

  6. 06-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Sub Judge-I

  7. 29-Aug-2025

    Appearence

    Sub Judge-I

  8. 12-Jun-2025

    Appearence

    Sub Judge-I

  9. 14-May-2025

    Appearence

    Sub Judge-I

  10. 02-May-2025

    Stistedar Report

    Sub Judge-I

  11. 02-Apr-2025

    Stistedar Report

  12. 04-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 17-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Sub-Judge I Court at Jagdishpur, Bhojpur allowed a miscellaneous petition under CPC Section 151 to restore original case No. 391/2021, which had been dismissed on 07.01.2025 when the plaintiff failed to appear. The court found the petitioner's explanation regarding non-appearance due to illness and lack of notice credible after he appeared and gave sworn testimony on 29.08.2025, and restored the case for proper continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case