SUSHIL KUMAR RAM vs ANGALI KUMARI — 383/2023
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.
MATRIMONIAL CASE
CNR: BRBJ010168902023
Filing Number
921/2023
Filing Date
16-Oct-2023
Registration No
383/2023
Registration Date
16-Oct-2023
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
2-Principal Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUSHIL KUMAR RAM
Adv. OM PRAKASH CHAUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANGALI KUMARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Family Court, Bhojpur dismissed matrimonial case no. 383/2023 on 10-03-2026 due to the petitioner's repeated non-appearance and failure to comply with court orders despite multiple summons. The court found sufficient grounds to conclude that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the case and therefore dismissed it for lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
02-Aug-2025
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
05-Jun-2025
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
03-Jun-2024
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
15-Mar-2024
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
22-Nov-2023
Awaiting Notice
Principal Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 383/2023
Summary The Family Court, Bhojpur dismissed matrimonial case no. 383/2023 on 10-03-2026 due to the petitioner's repeated non-appearance and failure to comply with court orders despite multiple summons. The court found sufficient grounds to conclude that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the case and therefore dismissed it for lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts