JIBODHAN SINGH vs SHIV SHANKAR SAH — 458/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRBJ010131652023
Filing Number
13164/2023
Filing Date
09-Aug-2023
Registration No
458/2023
Registration Date
23-Aug-2023
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
4-Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
83
Police Station
CHARPOKHARI
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JIBODHAN SINGH
Adv. SDPO
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIV SHANKAR SAH
-
2.BHUTELI RAM
-
3.MADAN RAM @ MADAN PASWAN(Abated)
-
4.AKHILESH SAH @ PAUBA(Abated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge of Bhojpur acquitted accused Bhuteli Ram of charges under IPC sections 302/34 (murder) and the Arms Act section 27, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that neither eyewitness saw the alleged shooting, no medical or investigative officer testimony was provided, and the informant signed the FIR without reading it, creating insufficient evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
04-Jun-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
20-May-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
06-May-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
12-Jul-2024
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
22-May-2024
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII
-
05-Apr-2024
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII
-
07-Mar-2024
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII
-
05-Feb-2024
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII
-
10-Jan-2024
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII
-
29-Nov-2023
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII
-
02-Nov-2023
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII
-
11-Oct-2023
Appearence
Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII
-
15-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 458/2023
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge of Bhojpur acquitted accused Bhuteli Ram of charges under IPC sections 302/34 (murder) and the Arms Act section 27, finding the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that neither eyewitness saw the alleged shooting, no medical or investigative officer testimony was provided, and the informant signed the FIR without reading it, creating insufficient evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts