M/S JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL INDIA PVT. LTD. vs AMIT KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. — 142/2021

Case under Arbitration Act Section 36 r/w2(e). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXECUITION CASES

CNR: BRBJ010100582021

Filing Number

840/2021

Filing Date

01-Oct-2021

Registration No

142/2021

Registration Date

01-Oct-2021

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

5-Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Act Section 36 r/w2(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL INDIA PVT. LTD.

    Adv. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.

  2. 2.SUMITRA DEVI

  3. 3.MUNNA KUMAR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District Judge-II Court at Biojpur, Ara dismissed the execution case (No. 142/2021) against the decree holder on 09-03-2026, finding that the decree holder had deliberately and knowingly failed to comply with prior court orders for several years and was merely seeking to delay proceedings. The court concluded that the decree holder had lost all interest in the matter and therefore dismissed the case in the interest of justice, ordering records to be deposited after the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  4. 08-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  5. 25-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  7. 20-Aug-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  8. 09-Jul-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  9. 29-May-2025

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  10. 24-Apr-2025

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  11. 07-Mar-2025

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  12. 24-Jan-2025

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  13. 07-Dec-2024

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  14. 05-Oct-2024

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  15. 12-Aug-2024

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  16. 19-Jun-2024

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  17. 03-May-2024

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  18. 12-Mar-2024

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  19. 24-Jan-2024

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  20. 11-Dec-2023

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  21. 10-Oct-2023

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  22. 22-Aug-2023

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  23. 05-Jul-2023

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  24. 16-May-2023

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  25. 17-Mar-2023

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J - XVIII

  26. 27-Jan-2023

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J - XVIII

  27. 12-Dec-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J - XVIII

  28. 02-Nov-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J - XVIII

  29. 03-Sep-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J - XVIII

  30. 28-Jul-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J - XVIII

  31. 20-Jun-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIV

  32. 13-May-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIV

  33. 02-Apr-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIV

  34. 03-Mar-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIV

  35. 27-Jan-2022

    Issues Notice

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIV

  36. 16-Dec-2021

    Issues Notice

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  37. 01-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 01-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge-II Court at Biojpur, Ara dismissed the execution case (No. 142/2021) against the decree holder on 09-03-2026, finding that the decree holder had deliberately and knowingly failed to comply with prior court orders for several years and was merely seeking to delay proceedings. The court concluded that the decree holder had lost all interest in the matter and therefore dismissed the case in the interest of justice, ordering records to be deposited after the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case