STATE vs OM PRAKASH SINGH — 263/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,412. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRBJ010079182025

Filing Number

7417/2025

Filing Date

28-May-2025

Registration No

263/2025

Registration Date

28-May-2025

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

4-Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

526

Police Station

UDWANT NAGAR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 395,412

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OM PRAKASH SINGH

  2. 2.SUMIT SINGH URD BRAJESH KUMAR

  3. 3.SATISH KUMAR

  4. 4.SUNIL KUMAR

  5. 5.DINESH SINGH

  6. 6.PAPPU KUMAR URF PRADEEP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Court Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur acquitted all six accused persons (Om Prakash Singh, Sumit Singh @ Brajesh Kumar, Dinesh Singh, Satish Kumar, Pappu Kumar @ Pradeep, and Sunil Kumar) of charges under Sections 395 (dacoity) and 412 (handling stolen goods) of the IPC. The court found the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing material contradictions in witness testimonies, absence of test identification parades, lack of recovered stolen wheat (25 tons), and defective investigation with no corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  14. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  16. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  17. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  18. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  19. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  20. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  21. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  22. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  23. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  24. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  25. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  26. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  27. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  28. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  29. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  30. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  31. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  32. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  33. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  34. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  35. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  36. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  37. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV

  38. 29-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 28-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 263/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur acquitted all six accused persons (Om Prakash Singh, Sumit Singh @ Brajesh Kumar, Dinesh Singh, Satish Kumar, Pappu Kumar @ Pradeep, and Sunil Kumar) of charges under Sections 395 (dacoity) and 412 (handling stolen goods) of the IPC. The court found the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing material contradictions in witness testimonies, absence of test identification parades, lack of recovered stolen wheat (25 tons), and defective investigation with no corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case