VISHNU NAND KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 886/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),109(1),292,352,3(5),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBJ010039682026

Filing Number

3210/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

886/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

18-Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

653

Police Station

ARRAH NAWADA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),109(1),292,352,3(5),351(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU NAND KUMAR

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Vishnu Nand Kumar, who was accused of instigating a shooting and assault (under BNS sections 126(2), 109(1), 292, 352, 3(5), 351(2) and Arms Act section 27). The court found that there was no direct allegation of firing against the petitioner, the injury was simple in nature, co-accused had already been granted bail, and he had been in custody for over three months. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, with conditions that one surety be a family member and the petitioner appear in court until charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -XIII

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 886/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Vishnu Nand Kumar, who was accused of instigating a shooting and assault (under BNS sections 126(2), 109(1), 292, 352, 3(5), 351(2) and Arms Act section 27). The court found that there was no direct allegation of firing against the petitioner, the injury was simple in nature, co-accused had already been granted bail, and he had been in custody for over three months. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, with conditions that one surety be a family member and the petitioner appear in court until charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case