RAHUL TIWARY vs State of Bihar — 700/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010039642026

Filing Number

3206/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

700/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

11-Distt. and Addl. S.J -VIII

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

BAHORANPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL TIWARY

    Adv. KALIKA SHARAN OJHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Rahul Tiwary's anticipatory bail petition in a kidnapping case. Although the victim's statement indicated she voluntarily left with Tiwary and married him consensually, the court found the victim was a minor on the date of the offense based on school records, and considered the gravity of the offense and Tiwary's status as the main accused as grounds for denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -VIII

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -VIII

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -VIII

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -VIII

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 700/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Rahul Tiwary's anticipatory bail petition in a kidnapping case. Although the victim's statement indicated she voluntarily left with Tiwary and married him consensually, the court found the victim was a minor on the date of the offense based on school records, and considered the gravity of the offense and Tiwary's status as the main accused as grounds for denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case