RAJ KUMAR PASWAN vs State of Bihar — 695/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010039262026

Filing Number

3168/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

695/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

5-Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

66

Police Station

ARRAH TOWN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),110,303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR PASWAN

    Adv. AKSHAY LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Raj Kumar Paswan in a case involving alleged assault and robbery. The judge found the prosecution's case weak due to significant delays in FIR registration (51 days between incident and complaint) without explanation, absence of case diary despite pending proceedings, and lack of direct evidence against the petitioner. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 695/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Raj Kumar Paswan in a case involving alleged assault and robbery. The judge found the prosecution's case weak due to significant delays in FIR registration (51 days between incident and complaint) without explanation, absence of case diary despite pending proceedings, and lack of direct evidence against the petitioner. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case