UPENDRA KUMAR ALIAS UPENDRA PASWAN vs State of Bihar — 852/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBJ010038622026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3114/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
852/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
80
Police Station
DHOBAHA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UPENDRA KUMAR ALIAS UPENDRA PASWAN
Adv. MUKTESHWAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Disposed
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 02-04-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 26-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 23-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed the bail petition of Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Paswan, who is accused of causing the death of his wife Baby Kumari through beating and throttling under BNS Section 103(1). The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner, noting that all prosecution witnesses supported the prosecution's case, the investigation was still ongoing, and there was a genuine risk of witness tampering, making continued custody necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed the bail petition of Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Paswan, who is accused of causing the death of his wife Baby Kumari through beating and throttling under BNS Section 103(1). The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner, noting that all prosecution witnesses supported the prosecution's case, the investigation was still ongoing, and there was a genuine risk of witness tampering, making continued custody necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts