CHINTU SONAR ALIAS CHINTU KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 685/2026

Case under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r),3(s),3(1)(w),3(2)(v). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010038592026

Filing Number

3111/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

685/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

HASAN BAZAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(r),3(s),3(1)(w),3(2)(v)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,115(2)126(2)308(5),324(4)303(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHINTU SONAR ALIAS CHINTU KUMAR

    Adv. Chandeshwar Rai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Chintu Sonar, who was accused of extortion, assault, and caste-based abuse under BNS 2023 and SC/ST (POA) Act. The court found direct and specific allegations against the petitioner supported by the FIR, informant statements, and witness testimony, and dismissed the petition as unmaintainable considering the serious and grave nature of the offenses under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Chintu Sonar, who was accused of extortion, assault, and caste-based abuse under BNS 2023 and SC/ST (POA) Act. The court found direct and specific allegations against the petitioner supported by the FIR, informant statements, and witness testimony, and dismissed the petition as unmaintainable considering the serious and grave nature of the offenses under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case