MANJU YADAV ALIAS MANJU KUMAR AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar — 682/2026

Case under Excise Act (Bihar) Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010038502026

Filing Number

3102/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

682/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

26-Special Judge Excise Court N-II

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

SIKAR-HATTA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Excise Act (Bihar) Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJU YADAV ALIAS MANJU KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SINGH

  2. 2.ARUN YADAV ALIAS ARUN KUMAR

  3. 3.BHIM KUMAR ALIAS OM PRAKASH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Exclusive Special Excise Court-2, Bhojpur rejected the anticipatory bail application of three accused (Manju Yadav, Arun Yadav, and Bhim Kumar) charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018 for possession of 15 liters of country-made liquor. The court found that the accused fled when police arrived at the spot, leaving behind the liquor, and were identified by the local chaukidar, making the charges credible and the gravity of offense sufficient to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Excise Court N-II

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 682/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Exclusive Special Excise Court-2, Bhojpur rejected the anticipatory bail application of three accused (Manju Yadav, Arun Yadav, and Bhim Kumar) charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018 for possession of 15 liters of country-made liquor. The court found that the accused fled when police arrived at the spot, leaving behind the liquor, and were identified by the local chaukidar, making the charges credible and the gravity of offense sufficient to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case