PAPU SAH ALIAS SANJEET KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 681/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,80(2),238,61(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010038482026
Filing Number
3100/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
681/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
AZIMABAD
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PAPU SAH ALIAS SANJEET KUMAR AND ANOTHER
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
-
2.KANCHAN SAH ALIAS KANCHAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to Pappu Sah @ Sanjeet Kumar and Kanchan Sah @ Kanchan Kumari in a dowry death case. The court found that the petitioners, being cousin siblings of the main accused (husband), were living separately from his family and that only vague and general allegations were made against them without concrete evidence of prior dowry demands. The petitioners were enlarged on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds each and two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 681/2026
Summary: The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to Pappu Sah @ Sanjeet Kumar and Kanchan Sah @ Kanchan Kumari in a dowry death case. The court found that the petitioners, being cousin siblings of the main accused (husband), were living separately from his family and that only vague and general allegations were made against them without concrete evidence of prior dowry demands. The petitioners were enlarged on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds each and two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts