SAROJ CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 680/2026
Case under Excise Act (Bihar) Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010038382026
Filing Number
3092/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
680/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
25-Special Judge Excise Court N-I
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
KRISHNAGARH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAROJ CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER
Adv. KALIKA SHARAN OJHA
-
2.KAMLESH PASWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Exclusive Special Excise Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Saroj Chaudhary and Kamlesh Paswan, who were accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018 for possession of 242.28 liters of English wine. The court found that the petitioners were named in the FIR, the contraband was recovered from the spot, and they fled the scene, making them unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Special Judge Excise Court N-I
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Excise Court N-I
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Excise Court N-I
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Excise Court N-I
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Excise Court N-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge Excise Court N-I
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 680/2026
Summary: The Exclusive Special Excise Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Saroj Chaudhary and Kamlesh Paswan, who were accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act 2018 for possession of 242.28 liters of English wine. The court found that the petitioners were named in the FIR, the contraband was recovered from the spot, and they fled the scene, making them unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts