UPENDRA YADAV AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 813/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,103(1),109. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 15th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBJ010037592026
Filing Number
3018/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
813/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
4-Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
376
Police Station
UDWANT NAGAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UPENDRA YADAV AND ANOTHER
Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR SINGH
-
2.MUNNA KUMAR ALIAS CHAHETU
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
DecreeView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Upendra Yadav and Munna Kumar, accused of firing at and fatally assaulting Collector Yadav in July 2025. The court found strong prosecution evidence including witness statements, post-mortem reports confirming death by blunt force trauma, and a charge-sheet, noting the seriousness of the offence warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
08-Apr-2026
Order
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Distt. and Addl. S.J -IV
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 813/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Upendra Yadav and Munna Kumar, accused of firing at and fatally assaulting Collector Yadav in July 2025. The court found strong prosecution evidence including witness statements, post-mortem reports confirming death by blunt force trauma, and a charge-sheet, noting the seriousness of the offence warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts