KALLU THAKUR ALIAS BISHWAS KR THAKUR vs State of Bihar — 784/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 342,323,307,379,387,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBJ010035932026

Filing Number

2861/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

784/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

BIHIAYAN

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 342,323,307,379,387,504,34
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALLU THAKUR ALIAS BISHWAS KR THAKUR

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted bail to petitioner Kallu Thakur, who was accused of extortion, assault, and attempted murder under IPC sections 342, 323, 307, 379, 387, 504, 34 and Arms Act 27. The court found that injuries were simple in nature (not grievous), the investigation was complete with charge-sheet filed, there was no risk of witness tampering, and the petitioner was a permanent district resident. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions prohibiting similar offences and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 784/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted bail to petitioner Kallu Thakur, who was accused of extortion, assault, and attempted murder under IPC sections 342, 323, 307, 379, 387, 504, 34 and Arms Act 27. The court found that injuries were simple in nature (not grievous), the investigation was complete with charge-sheet filed, there was no risk of witness tampering, and the petitioner was a permanent district resident. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions prohibiting similar offences and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case