UPENDRA SINGH ALIAS UTKARSH vs State of Bihar — 763/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),319(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBJ010035922026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2860/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
763/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
Cyber Thana
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UPENDRA SINGH ALIAS UTKARSH
Adv. ANIT KUMAR BANTI
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Disposed
ORDER
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 28-02-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District and Sessions Court of Bhojpur dismissed the bail petition of Upendra Singh @ Utkarsh, who was arrested in a cyber fraud case where a medical officer was defrauded of ₹19 lakh through impersonation of an ATS officer and fictitious court proceedings. The court found that while the petitioner was initially not named in the FIR, his involvement emerged from the confessional statement of co-accused Jishan Khan, and considering the serious nature of digital fraud, the complexity of the case still in initial stages, and the difficulty in tracing cyber criminals, bail was deemed inappropriate at this juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District and Sessions Court of Bhojpur dismissed the bail petition of Upendra Singh @ Utkarsh, who was arrested in a cyber fraud case where a medical officer was defrauded of ₹19 lakh through impersonation of an ATS officer and fictitious court proceedings. The court found that while the petitioner was initially not named in the FIR, his involvement emerged from the confessional statement of co-accused Jishan Khan, and considering the serious nature of digital fraud, the complexity of the case still in initial stages, and the difficulty in tracing cyber criminals, bail was deemed inappropriate at this juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts