GANESH TIWARY AND ORS. vs State of Bihar — 612/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,448,346,323,308,379. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010034642026

Filing Number

2744/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

612/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

5-Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

SHAHPUR

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,448,346,323,308,379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANESH TIWARY AND ORS.

    Adv. Virendra Mishra

  2. 2.NOMI TIWARY

  3. 3.NORVESH TIWARY

  4. 4.JAY PRAKASH TIWARY

  5. 5.SANJAY TIWARY

  6. 6.DHANANJAY TIWARY

  7. 7.UPENDRA TIWARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused (Ganesh Tiwary and others) in an assault and robbery case. The court found that the allegations were general and omnibus in nature with no specific role assigned to individual petitioners, and that injury reports showed only simple injuries with incomplete medical opinions. The petitioners were enlarged on bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 612/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused (Ganesh Tiwary and others) in an assault and robbery case. The court found that the allegations were general and omnibus in nature with no specific role assigned to individual petitioners, and that injury reports showed only simple injuries with incomplete medical opinions. The petitioners were enlarged on bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case