PINTU CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar — 597/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,109,303(2),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010033872026

Filing Number

2683/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

597/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

DHANGAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),74,109,303(2),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINTU CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS

    Adv. MRITUNJAY KUMAR

  2. 2.NANDU CHOUDHARY

  3. 3.LAXMINA DEVI

  4. 4.FUL KUMARI ALIAS FUL KUMARI DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The District & Sessions Judge of Bhojpur partially allowed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four accused. The court granted bail to female petitioners Laxmina Devi and Ful Kumari on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each, finding allegations against them (ornamental theft) to be exaggerated. However, the court dismissed the bail petition of Pintu Chaudhary and Nandu Chaudhary, finding specific and credible allegations of assault and outraging modesty corroborated by injury reports, with genuine risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 597/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Sessions Judge of Bhojpur partially allowed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four accused. The court granted bail to female petitioners Laxmina Devi and Ful Kumari on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each, finding allegations against them (ornamental theft) to be exaggerated. However, the court dismissed the bail petition of Pintu Chaudhary and Nandu Chaudhary, finding specific and credible allegations of assault and outraging modesty corroborated by injury reports, with genuine risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case