State of Bihar vs ANAND KUMAR RAM — 112/2026
Case under Repealing and Amending Act Section 126(2), 115(2), 352, 125(B), 303(2), 117(2), 329(4), 109(1), 3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 19th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRBJ010033782026
Filing Number
2674/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0090
Police Station
BIHIAYAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANAND KUMAR RAM
-
2.BHOLA PASWAN
-
3.RANJIV PASWAN
-
4.SANI PASWAN
-
5.PRAHALAD PASWAN
-
6.JITU PASWAN
-
7.SANTSHARAN PASWAN
-
8.NIRANJAN PASWAN
-
9.PRINS PASWAN
-
10.SAURABH PRAKASH
-
11.RAMNATH PASWAN
-
12.RAKESH PASWAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Court, Bhojpur (Case No. 112/2026, dated 19.03.2026) dismissed charges against multiple accused under IPC sections 126(2)/3(5), 109(1)/3(5), 125(B)/3(5), and 303(2), finding insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy. The court held that mere suspicion does not constitute proof, and the prosecution failed to establish any concrete criminal act or agreement among the accused, thus acquitting them under Section 255 of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2026
Summary The Principal District and Sessions Court, Bhojpur (Case No. 112/2026, dated 19.03.2026) dismissed charges against multiple accused under IPC sections 126(2)/3(5), 109(1)/3(5), 125(B)/3(5), and 303(2), finding insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy. The court held that mere suspicion does not constitute proof, and the prosecution failed to establish any concrete criminal act or agreement among the accused, thus acquitting them under Section 255 of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts