State of Bihar vs ANAND KUMAR RAM — 112/2026

Case under Repealing and Amending Act Section 126(2), 115(2), 352, 125(B), 303(2), 117(2), 329(4), 109(1), 3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 19th March 2026.

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRBJ010033782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2674/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

0090

Police Station

BIHIAYAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Repealing and Amending Act Section 126(2), 115(2), 352, 125(B), 303(2), 117(2), 329(4), 109(1), 3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Bihar

Respondent(s)

ANAND KUMAR RAM

BHOLA PASWAN

RANJIV PASWAN

SANI PASWAN

PRAHALAD PASWAN

JITU PASWAN

SANTSHARAN PASWAN

NIRANJAN PASWAN

PRINS PASWAN

SAURABH PRAKASH

RAMNATH PASWAN

RAKESH PASWAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

19-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.

16-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

09-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

25-02-2026

Charge

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Order

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Court, Bhojpur (Case No. 112/2026, dated 19.03.2026) dismissed charges against multiple accused under IPC sections 126(2)/3(5), 109(1)/3(5), 125(B)/3(5), and 303(2), finding insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy. The court held that mere suspicion does not constitute proof, and the prosecution failed to establish any concrete criminal act or agreement among the accused, thus acquitting them under Section 255 of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District and Sessions Court, Bhojpur (Case No. 112/2026, dated 19.03.2026) dismissed charges against multiple accused under IPC sections 126(2)/3(5), 109(1)/3(5), 125(B)/3(5), and 303(2), finding insufficient evidence of criminal conspiracy. The court held that mere suspicion does not constitute proof, and the prosecution failed to establish any concrete criminal act or agreement among the accused, thus acquitting them under Section 255 of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Bhojpur DJ Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case