MUNNA RAM AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 578/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,329(3),126(2),127(2),109,115(2),303(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010032522026

Filing Number

2555/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

578/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

CHAURI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,329(3),126(2),127(2),109,115(2),303(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNNA RAM AND ANOTHER

    Adv. KAMLESH KUMAR SINGH

  2. 2.HAREKRISHNA ALIAS HARE KRISHNA NARAYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Munna Ram and Harekrishna @ Hare Krishna Narayan in connection with FIR No. 16/2026 involving charges of criminal trespass, assault, and theft. Although the court found the petitioners were non-assailants with no specific allegations against them and acknowledged their clean antecedents, it deemed the bail petition devoid of merit, likely due to the case being at an initial investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 578/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Munna Ram and Harekrishna @ Hare Krishna Narayan in connection with FIR No. 16/2026 involving charges of criminal trespass, assault, and theft. Although the court found the petitioners were non-assailants with no specific allegations against them and acknowledged their clean antecedents, it deemed the bail petition devoid of merit, likely due to the case being at an initial investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case