VINOD KUMAR PRASAD vs State of Bihar — 576/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,341,504,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010032452026

Filing Number

2550/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

576/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

470

Police Station

KOILWAR

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,341,504,34
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(i)(r)(s)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD KUMAR PRASAD

    Adv. UMESH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vinod Kumar Prasad, who was accused of criminal breach of trust, cheating, wrongful restraint, and offenses under the SC/ST Act for allegedly misappropriating Rs. 4,12,000 and assaulting the complainant. The court found that the informant and witnesses corroborated the prosecution's allegations, and considering the serious nature of the charges and section 18 of the SC/ST Act, dismissed the petition as not maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 576/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vinod Kumar Prasad, who was accused of criminal breach of trust, cheating, wrongful restraint, and offenses under the SC/ST Act for allegedly misappropriating Rs. 4,12,000 and assaulting the complainant. The court found that the informant and witnesses corroborated the prosecution's allegations, and considering the serious nature of the charges and section 18 of the SC/ST Act, dismissed the petition as not maintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case