CHHATHU PASWAN ALIAS CHHATHU RAM AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar — 573/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010032212026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2527/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
573/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
ARRAH MUFFASSIL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHHATHU PASWAN ALIAS CHHATHU RAM AND OTHERS
Adv. ANANT SINGH
NIHORA PASWAN
NAMEE PASWAN
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Disposed
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 24-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 23-02-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, granted anticipatory bail to Chhathu Paswan, Nihora Paswan, and Namee Paswan, who were accused of assaulting the informant and his brother during a Saraswati Puja celebration. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted the absence of injury reports, and emphasized that the parties had amicably settled their dispute with the informant's consent to bail. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to cooperation with police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, granted anticipatory bail to Chhathu Paswan, Nihora Paswan, and Namee Paswan, who were accused of assaulting the informant and his brother during a Saraswati Puja celebration. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted the absence of injury reports, and emphasized that the parties had amicably settled their dispute with the informant's consent to bail. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to cooperation with police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts