PAWAN KUMAR RAI ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 567/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010031762026

Filing Number

2486/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

567/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

477

Police Station

SHAHPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,411
Bihar Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Minings, Transportation and Storage) Section 56(1),56

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR RAI ALIAS PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. ATMA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Pawan Kumar Rai and Pawan Kumar in an illegal sand mining case (FIR No. 477/2023) involving charges under IPC sections 379, 411 and BMC Rules 56(1), 56(2). The court found all charges carry less than 7 years imprisonment, fell under Supreme Court precedents (Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and Satyendra Kumar Antil v. CBI), and noted the petitioners' clean record and that evidence was secure with Mining Department. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, subject to availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 567/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Pawan Kumar Rai and Pawan Kumar in an illegal sand mining case (FIR No. 477/2023) involving charges under IPC sections 379, 411 and BMC Rules 56(1), 56(2). The court found all charges carry less than 7 years imprisonment, fell under Supreme Court precedents (Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and Satyendra Kumar Antil v. CBI), and noted the petitioners' clean record and that evidence was secure with Mining Department. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, subject to availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case