SUMAN SAURABH CHAUHAN vs State of Bihar — 624/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),319(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010030902026
Filing Number
2408/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
624/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Cyber Thana
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMAN SAURABH CHAUHAN
Adv. Sunil Kumar Goswami
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The District & Sessions Judge in Bhojpur rejected bail petitions for Rohit Kumar, Mohit Kumar, and Suman Saurabh Chauhan, who are accused of operating a cyber fraud scheme involving opening fraudulent bank accounts across multiple states and receiving commissions for facilitating illegal transactions. The court found strong evidence of their involvement including confessional statements, WhatsApp chats, and details of 21 bank accounts opened for illicit purposes, and emphasized that cyber fraud is serious in nature requiring rigorous investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 624/2026
The District & Sessions Judge in Bhojpur rejected bail petitions for Rohit Kumar, Mohit Kumar, and Suman Saurabh Chauhan, who are accused of operating a cyber fraud scheme involving opening fraudulent bank accounts across multiple states and receiving commissions for facilitating illegal transactions. The court found strong evidence of their involvement including confessional statements, WhatsApp chats, and details of 21 bank accounts opened for illicit purposes, and emphasized that cyber fraud is serious in nature requiring rigorous investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts