TENGAR SINGH ALIAS SURYANATH SINGH vs State of Bihar — 553/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),118(1),76,351(2),352. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAW on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010030822026

Filing Number

2400/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

553/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAW

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

HASAN BAZAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),118(1),76,351(2),352
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1),3(1)(D),3(1)(W),3(2)(Va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TENGAR SINGH ALIAS SURYANATH SINGH

    Adv. ISHWAR CHANDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail petition filed by Tengar Singh @ Suryanath Singh, who was facing charges under BNS sections and the SC/ST (POA) Act. The petitioner obtained the benefit of Section 35(3) BNSS and withdrew the petition, which the Special Public Prosecutor did not oppose, resulting in dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 553/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail petition filed by Tengar Singh @ Suryanath Singh, who was facing charges under BNS sections and the SC/ST (POA) Act. The petitioner obtained the benefit of Section 35(3) BNSS and withdrew the petition, which the Special Public Prosecutor did not oppose, resulting in dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case