SUJEET KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 537/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),223,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010030232026

Filing Number

2346/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

537/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

5-Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

250

Police Station

KOILWAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),223,3(5)
Bihar Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Minings, Transportation and Storage) Section 56(1),56(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUJEET KUMAR

    Adv. BISHNUDHAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Sujeet Kumar in an illegal mining case, finding that the prosecution failed to provide specific evidence showing how the petitioner manipulated the Mining Soft portal or engaged in illegal extraction, relying only on general allegations. The petitioner was granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, valid for one month, despite having two prior criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Sujeet Kumar in an illegal mining case, finding that the prosecution failed to provide specific evidence showing how the petitioner manipulated the Mining Soft portal or engaged in illegal extraction, relying only on general allegations. The petitioner was granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, valid for one month, despite having two prior criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case