ABHIJEET SINGH ALIAS ABHIJIT DATTA ALIAS ABHIJIT KUMA DATTA vs State of Bihar — 499/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,120B. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010028312026

Filing Number

2168/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

499/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

247

Police Station

KOILWAR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,120B
Arms Act Section 27
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHIJEET SINGH ALIAS ABHIJIT DATTA ALIAS ABHIJIT KUMA DATTA

    Adv. RAJU KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Abhijeet Singh, accused of murder under IPC sections 302, 120-B, the Arms Act, and SC/ST Act. While the petitioner was not named in the FIR and his involvement was based solely on a co-accused's custodial confession, the court found the nature and gravity of the offense serious and determined that witness statements supported the prosecution's case, making the bail petition unmaintainable under section 18 of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 499/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Abhijeet Singh, accused of murder under IPC sections 302, 120-B, the Arms Act, and SC/ST Act. While the petitioner was not named in the FIR and his involvement was based solely on a co-accused's custodial confession, the court found the nature and gravity of the offense serious and determined that witness statements supported the prosecution's case, making the bail petition unmaintainable under section 18 of the SC/ST Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case