MD. RASID ALIAS MD. BHOLA AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar — 429/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),110,74,351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010025412026
Filing Number
1907/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
429/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
ARRAH TOWN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. RASID ALIAS MD. BHOLA AND OTHERS
Adv. MD. IKHTESAR
-
2.MD. SAJID ALIAS MD. CHHOTU
-
3.MD. FIROJ
-
4.MD. JAHID ALIAS RAJA
-
5.MD. IMTIYAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The District & Sessions Court, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to all five petitioners (Md. Rasid, Md. Sajid, Md. Firoz, Md. Jahid, and Md. Imtiyaz) in a case involving alleged threats, abuse, and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations against the petitioners to be general, exaggerated, and part of a neighbor dispute with counter-cases, and noted the petitioners' clean antecedents and willingness to cooperate. Each petitioner was ordered to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 429/2026
The District & Sessions Court, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to all five petitioners (Md. Rasid, Md. Sajid, Md. Firoz, Md. Jahid, and Md. Imtiyaz) in a case involving alleged threats, abuse, and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations against the petitioners to be general, exaggerated, and part of a neighbor dispute with counter-cases, and noted the petitioners' clean antecedents and willingness to cooperate. Each petitioner was ordered to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including availability for police interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts