BHUPENDRA RAI AND ANOTHER vs State of Bihar — 378/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),3(5),61(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010023132026
Filing Number
1695/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
378/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
BAHORANPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHUPENDRA RAI AND ANOTHER
Adv. Rameshwar Tiwari
-
2.DHIRENDRA RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Bhupendra Rai and Dhirenra Rai in a firearms and criminal intimidation case, finding no direct allegation of assault against them and noting their prior acquittals in similar cases. The court imposed bail conditions of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, considering the petitioners were not present at the crime scene and only allegedly made an inciting phone call to co-accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Distt. and Addl. S.J -I
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -I
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -I
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -I
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -I
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
Distt. and Addl. S.J -I
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 378/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Bhupendra Rai and Dhirenra Rai in a firearms and criminal intimidation case, finding no direct allegation of assault against them and noting their prior acquittals in similar cases. The court imposed bail conditions of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, considering the petitioners were not present at the crime scene and only allegedly made an inciting phone call to co-accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts