MANU YADAV vs State of Bihar — 413/2026

Case under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(i)(r)(s). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBJ010021582026

Filing Number

1557/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

413/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(i)(r)(s)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANU YADAV

    Adv. NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court granted bail to accused Manu Yadav in an SC/ST (POA) Act case involving allegations of outraging modesty and assault. The judge approved the bail petition considering that despite serious charges, no prosecution witness had been produced despite multiple scheduled dates, the accused had been in custody for nearly five months, and he had not misused bail in two other pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 413/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to accused Manu Yadav in an SC/ST (POA) Act case involving allegations of outraging modesty and assault. The judge approved the bail petition considering that despite serious charges, no prosecution witness had been produced despite multiple scheduled dates, the accused had been in custody for nearly five months, and he had not misused bail in two other pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case