ARUN ALIAS ARUN YADAV AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar — 340/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),108,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010021362026
Filing Number
1535/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
340/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
753
Police Station
ARRAH TOWN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN ALIAS ARUN YADAV AND OTHERS
Adv. BINAY SHANKAR TIWARI
-
2.BARUN ALIAS BARUN YADAV
-
3.SANDEEP ALAIS SANDEEP YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to three young petitioners (aged 18-20) accused of poisoning a family member. The court allowed the bail primarily because the informant (the alleged victim) appeared before the court and stated she had amicably settled her dispute with the petitioners, had no objection to their release, and confirmed they are her brother-in-laws. The absence of any medical report substantiating the poisoning allegation and the petitioners' clean antecedents further supported the decision. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 340/2026
Summary The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur granted anticipatory bail to three young petitioners (aged 18-20) accused of poisoning a family member. The court allowed the bail primarily because the informant (the alleged victim) appeared before the court and stated she had amicably settled her dispute with the petitioners, had no objection to their release, and confirmed they are her brother-in-laws. The absence of any medical report substantiating the poisoning allegation and the petitioners' clean antecedents further supported the decision. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts