MD. NASIM ANSARI vs State of Bihar — 321/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),85,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBJ010020622026

Filing Number

1473/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

321/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

5-Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

441

Police Station

JAGDISHPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),85,352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. NASIM ANSARI

    Adv. SACHINDRA TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Md. Nasim Ansari in a domestic violence case involving allegations of assault and extortion. The court found that independent witnesses did not support the prosecution case, the accused had no criminal record, and the informant sustained only simple injuries, warranting bail on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -II

  11. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 321/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Md. Nasim Ansari in a domestic violence case involving allegations of assault and extortion. The court found that independent witnesses did not support the prosecution case, the accused had no criminal record, and the informant sustained only simple injuries, warranting bail on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case