Sita Ram Nat vs Bhola Yadav Advocate - Ramdev Singh — 445/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504/34. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Appearence Next hearing 08-May-2026

Special Case (SC / ST Act)

CNR: BRBJ010008112017

Filing Number

445/2017

Filing Date

10-Sep-2015

Registration No

445/2017

Registration Date

10-Sep-2015

Court

Bhojpur DJ Division

Judge

3-Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

262

Police Station

BIHIAYAN

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504/34
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(i)(x)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sita Ram Nat

    Adv. Spl.p.p.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhola Yadav Advocate - Ramdev Singh

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  4. 01-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  5. 10-Sep-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  6. 27-Jun-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  7. 07-May-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  8. 25-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  9. 03-Dec-2024

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  10. 23-Sep-2024

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  11. 18-Jul-2024

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  12. 29-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  13. 31-Jan-2024

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  14. 23-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  15. 19-Sep-2023

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  16. 09-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  17. 12-Jun-2023

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  18. 20-Apr-2023

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  19. 27-Jan-2023

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  20. 18-Nov-2022

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  21. 30-Aug-2022

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  22. 10-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  23. 08-Apr-2022

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  24. 04-Feb-2022

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  25. 17-Dec-2021

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  26. 06-Oct-2021

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  27. 12-Aug-2021

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  28. 01-Jun-2021

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  29. 06-Apr-2021

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  30. 19-Feb-2021

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  31. 08-Jan-2021

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  32. 23-Nov-2020

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  33. 23-Sep-2020

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  34. 22-Jul-2020

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  35. 06-Jun-2020

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  36. 24-Mar-2020

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  37. 31-Jan-2020

    OrderView PDF

    Summary Bail granted to accused petitioner Ashok Yadav in an SC/ST Act case. The court granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, finding that the petitioner was falsely implicated, his absence was not deliberate, and a compromise petition had been filed by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  38. 31-Jan-2020

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  39. 28-Nov-2019

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  40. 05-Sep-2019

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  41. 28-Jun-2019

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  42. 09-May-2019

    Appearence

    Distt. and Addl. S.J -I

  43. 15-Feb-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 10-Sep-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 445/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Bail granted to accused petitioner Ashok Yadav in an SC/ST Act case. The court granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, finding that the petitioner was falsely implicated, his absence was not deliberate, and a compromise petition had been filed by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case