SURAJ KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 103/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),109(1),292. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBJ010006602026
Filing Number
470/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
103/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
833
Police Station
ARRAH NAWADA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURAJ KUMAR
Adv. Rajeev Ranjan Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of a 16-year-old juvenile accused of firing a gunshot that injured another 16-year-old boy in a public place. Although the petitioner raised the plea of juvenility, the Sessions Judge found the serious nature of the offense (committed in public with a firearm), the ongoing investigation, and the corroborated injury evidence outweighed bail considerations, dismissing the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 103/2026
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of a 16-year-old juvenile accused of firing a gunshot that injured another 16-year-old boy in a public place. Although the petitioner raised the plea of juvenility, the Sessions Judge found the serious nature of the offense (committed in public with a firearm), the ongoing investigation, and the corroborated injury evidence outweighed bail considerations, dismissing the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts