BANK OF BARODA vs SHAKUNTALA DEVI — 7/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CivilProcedureCode-2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

MONEY SUIT

CNR: BRBG220000872025

Filing Number

87/2025

Filing Date

12-Mar-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

12-Mar-2025

Court

Kahalgaon Civil Div

Judge

1-Civil Judge Sr. Div.-I

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section CivilProcedureCode-2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF BARODA

    Adv. BINAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAKUNTALA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case 7/2025: Bank of Baroda v. Shakuntala Devi The court disposed of the dispute by directing that the case be decided on the basis of the decree obtained by Bank of Baroda. The court found that the bank's petition seeking execution of the decree was valid and that the defendant failed to rebut the claims with proper evidence, thereby upholding the bank's right to enforce the decree against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Sr. Div.-I

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Stistedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div.-I

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Stistedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div.-I

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Stistedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div.-I

  7. 01-Nov-2025

    Stistedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div.-I

  8. 06-Aug-2025

    Stistedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div.-I

  9. 12-Jun-2025

    Stistedar Report

    Civil Judge Sr. Div.-I

  10. 16-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 7/2025: Bank of Baroda v. Shakuntala Devi The court disposed of the dispute by directing that the case be decided on the basis of the decree obtained by Bank of Baroda. The court found that the bank's petition seeking execution of the decree was valid and that the defendant failed to rebut the claims with proper evidence, thereby upholding the bank's right to enforce the decree against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case