Puso Yadav vs The State of Bihar — 70/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBG100002102026
Filing Number
219/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
70/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Naugachia
Judge
10-Additional District and Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
316
Police Station
Rangra
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Puso Yadav
Adv. Ashok Kumar Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Contested
The court granted bail to petitioner Puso Yadav, who was arrested on 27.02.2026 under sections 103(1), 3(5) B.N.S. and 27 Arms Act in connection with the murder of Pintu Yadav on 25.12.2025. Although the prosecution opposed bail citing the serious nature of charges, the court found that Yadav had no prior criminal history and granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions that he remain present during trial, not intimidate witnesses, and not leave the court's jurisdiction without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge I
-
28-Apr-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge I
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge I
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge I
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge I
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge I
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge I
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 70/2026
The court granted bail to petitioner Puso Yadav, who was arrested on 27.02.2026 under sections 103(1), 3(5) B.N.S. and 27 Arms Act in connection with the murder of Pintu Yadav on 25.12.2025. Although the prosecution opposed bail citing the serious nature of charges, the court found that Yadav had no prior criminal history and granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions that he remain present during trial, not intimidate witnesses, and not leave the court's jurisdiction without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts