SUMITRA DEVI, W/o - LATE JAGDISH RAM vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 582/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85, 126, 115, 352, 351, 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBG010027752026

Filing Number

2480/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

582/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

Bhagalpur DJ Div.

Judge

22-Additional District and Sessions Judge- XVI

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

AKBARNAGAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85, 126, 115, 352, 351, 3(5)
I.t. Act 2000 Section 66(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMITRA DEVI, W/o - LATE JAGDISH RAM

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR SINHA

  2. 2.RUDLI DEVI @ RUDHWA, W/o - LATE JAGDISH RAM

  3. 3.KIRAN DEVI, W/o - SURENDRA KUMAR

  4. 4.PRIYANKA DEVI @ KUMARI, D/o - SURENDRA KUMAR

  5. 5.PINKI DEVI, W/o - RAJESH KALINDI, D/o - SURENDRA KUMAR

  6. 6.SURENDRA KUMAR, S/o - JAGDISH RAM

  7. 7.BHARTI DEVI, W/o - SANDEEP RAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

  2. 2.SUJATA KUMARI,D/o - JAI PRAKASH PASWAN, W/o - AMIT KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 582/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge XVI, Bhagalpur granted anticipatory bail to seven accused (Sumitra Devi, Rudli Devi, Kiran Devi, Priyanka Devi, Pinki Devi, Surendra Kumar, and Bharti Devi) charged with dowry harassment and cruelty under non-bailable sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found the allegations against the in-laws were largely omnibus in nature, lacked specific attribution of individual acts, and involved a matrimonial dispute; coupled with the absence of criminal antecedents, the court deemed anticipatory bail appropriate on condition of Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each and strict undertakings prohibiting harassment of the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge- XVI

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge- XVI

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge- XVI

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 582/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 582/2026 The District & Additional Sessions Judge XVI, Bhagalpur granted anticipatory bail to seven accused (Sumitra Devi, Rudli Devi, Kiran Devi, Priyanka Devi, Pinki Devi, Surendra Kumar, and Bharti Devi) charged with dowry harassment and cruelty under non-bailable sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found the allegations against the in-laws were largely omnibus in nature, lacked specific attribution of individual acts, and involved a matrimonial dispute; coupled with the absence of criminal antecedents, the court deemed anticipatory bail appropriate on condition of Rs. 10,000 bail bonds each and strict undertakings prohibiting harassment of the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case