MD SONU, W/o - MD IQBAL vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 285/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBG010025932026

Filing Number

2320/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

285/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

Bhagalpur DJ Div.

Judge

19-Additional District and Sessions Judge XIII

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

LODIPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD SONU, W/o - MD IQBAL

    Adv. MD.IRFAN ALI KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge granted regular bail to petitioner Md. Sonu in a theft case (Lodipur P.S. Case No. 40/2025 under Section 305 B.N.S.), finding that while a Vivo mobile phone was recovered from his residence, he had no prior criminal record and had already spent over a month in judicial custody since 01.03.2026. The court allowed bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he not tamper with evidence and not repeat such offences, despite prosecution's argument that sufficient material existed against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge XIII

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge XIII

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge XIII

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted regular bail to petitioner Md. Sonu in a theft case (Lodipur P.S. Case No. 40/2025 under Section 305 B.N.S.), finding that while a Vivo mobile phone was recovered from his residence, he had no prior criminal record and had already spent over a month in judicial custody since 01.03.2026. The court allowed bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he not tamper with evidence and not repeat such offences, despite prosecution's argument that sufficient material existed against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case