RUPESH YADAV, S/o - LATE BIJO YADAV vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 267/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506/34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBG010024682026
Filing Number
2217/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
267/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Bhagalpur DJ Div.
Judge
22-Additional District and Sessions Judge- XVI
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
445
Police Station
NATH NAGAR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUPESH YADAV, S/o - LATE BIJO YADAV
Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Rupesh Yadav v. State of Bihar (267/2026) Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge XVI, Bhagalpur rejected Rupesh Yadav's bail petition on 06.04.2026. The court found that serious non-bailable offences (Section 307 IPC - attempt to murder, and Section 379 IPC - theft) were adequately supported by witness statements and medical evidence showing brick assault and Rs. 15,000 robbery. The petitioner's failure to comply with prior court directions to surrender and the previous rejection of his anticipatory bail by both the lower court and High Court weighed against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge- XVI
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge- XVI
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge- XVI
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 267/2026
Case Summary: Rupesh Yadav v. State of Bihar (267/2026) Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge XVI, Bhagalpur rejected Rupesh Yadav's bail petition on 06.04.2026. The court found that serious non-bailable offences (Section 307 IPC - attempt to murder, and Section 379 IPC - theft) were adequately supported by witness statements and medical evidence showing brick assault and Rs. 15,000 robbery. The petitioner's failure to comply with prior court directions to surrender and the previous rejection of his anticipatory bail by both the lower court and High Court weighed against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts