RANJAN KUMAR ALIAS TEMPU YADAV vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 417/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),324,324(6),351(1),352,238,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBG010019642026
Filing Number
1767/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
417/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Bhagalpur DJ Div.
Judge
4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
SULTANGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANJAN KUMAR ALIAS TEMPU YADAV
Adv. ANJANI KUMAR
-
2.GOVIND KUMAR ALIAS GOVIND YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 417/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ranjan Kumar and Govind Kumar, accused of assault and robbery on 22-01-2026. The court found that despite serious allegations including possession of firearms, no incriminating evidence, video footage, or injury reports were available on record, and most charges were bailable. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge Vigilance
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 417/2026
Case Summary: 417/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Ranjan Kumar and Govind Kumar, accused of assault and robbery on 22-01-2026. The court found that despite serious allegations including possession of firearms, no incriminating evidence, video footage, or injury reports were available on record, and most charges were bailable. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts