SUMITRA DEVI AND OTHERS vs SURESH MAHTO AND OTHERS — 84/1994
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBE420000041994
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
84/1994
Filing Date
22-12-2018
Registration No
84/1994
Registration Date
12-05-1994
Court
Teghra Civil Division
Judge
2-Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMITRA DEVI AND OTHERS
Adv. PP
RAMJI MAHTO
KRISHNA KUMAR MAHTO
SHRAVAN MAHTO
SHANKAR MAHTO
TUNTUN DEVI
CHUNAR DEVI
TARA DEVI
PANCHU DEVI
Respondent(s)
SURESH MAHTO AND OTHERS
DAY RANI DEVI
BINO DEVI
RAMASHISH MAHTO
SONELAL MAHTO
RAMSUDIN MAHTO
LAL BAHADUR
SATYA NARAYAN
SHANKAR MAHTO
LURKHI DEVI
MUKUND MAHTO
RAM SEWAK
PITAMBAR
SUKHO
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Munsif
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner | |
| 25-01-2026 | Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner | |
| 01-12-2025 | Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner | |
| 10-10-2025 | Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner | |
| 20-08-2025 | Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by Defendants Suresh Mahto, Lal Bahadur Mahto, and Amli Devi seeking transposition as plaintiffs in Title Suit No. 84 of 1994 is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner defendants failed to satisfy the legal tests required for transposition, including lack of substantial question to be decided against other defendants and absence of identity of interest with the plaintiffs. The case is put up on 19.06.12 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by Defendants Suresh Mahto, Lal Bahadur Mahto, and Amli Devi seeking transposition as plaintiffs in Title Suit No. 84 of 1994 is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner defendants failed to satisfy the legal tests required for transposition, including lack of substantial question to be decided against other defendants and absence of identity of interest with the plaintiffs. The case is put up on 19.06.12 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts