NAZIAH TARANNUM vs MD RAJAUDDIN AND OTHERS — 996/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRBE410004292015
Filing Number
996/2015
Filing Date
11-Mar-2015
Registration No
996/2015
Registration Date
11-Mar-2015
Court
Teghra CJM Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAZIAH TARANNUM
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MD RAJAUDDIN AND OTHERS
-
2.MD. SALAUDDIN
-
3.ISHRAT BANO
-
4.ZIYAUDDIN
-
5.MD. SABAUDDIN
-
6.JUHI KHATOON
-
7.SAGUFTA KHATOON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgment
The court acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC Section 498A (cruelty by husband/relatives toward married women) after the complainant Naziya Tarannum filed a joint compromise petition with the accused and testified during recall examination that she had willfully compromised the case, received ₹2,00,000 from her husband, and denied any dowry demands or harassment. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt given the complainant's retraction and unwillingness to contest further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Mar-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
18-Mar-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Jan-2026
Restored
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-Jan-2026
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
05-Jan-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
17-Dec-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Dec-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
03-Dec-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
03-Nov-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
26-Sep-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
25-Aug-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Jul-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Jun-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
05-May-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
24-Mar-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
28-Feb-2025
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
02-Dec-2024
Order
-
02-Dec-2024
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Oct-2024
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Aug-2024
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Jun-2024
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
01-May-2024
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
18-Mar-2024
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Feb-2024
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
03-Jan-2024
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
24-Nov-2023
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Sep-2023
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
18-Aug-2023
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
11-Aug-2023
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
07-Jun-2023
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-May-2023
Appearence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Apr-2023
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
03-Feb-2023
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
07-Dec-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Oct-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
05-Sep-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-Aug-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Jul-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-May-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
13-Apr-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
03-Mar-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
17-Jan-2022
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
17-Dec-2021
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
03-Nov-2021
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
25-Aug-2021
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
24-May-2021
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
29-Jan-2021
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
21-Dec-2020
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
18-Sep-2020
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Jul-2020
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
05-Jun-2020
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
08-Apr-2020
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
31-Jan-2020
Arguments
-
03-Jan-2020
Arguments
-
20-Dec-2019
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
04-Dec-2019
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Nov-2019
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Sep-2019
Defence Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
26-Aug-2019
Defence Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
24-Jul-2019
Defence Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
24-Jun-2019
Defence Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Jun-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
05-Apr-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-Mar-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
11-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 996/2015
The court acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC Section 498A (cruelty by husband/relatives toward married women) after the complainant Naziya Tarannum filed a joint compromise petition with the accused and testified during recall examination that she had willfully compromised the case, received ₹2,00,000 from her husband, and denied any dowry demands or harassment. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt given the complainant's retraction and unwillingness to contest further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts