PAPPI DEVI vs BUDDHAN SINGH AND OTHERS — 3269/2009

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A. Disposed: Uncontested--ABSCONDER on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: BRBE410002482009

Filing Number

3269/2009

Filing Date

22-Dec-2018

Registration No

3269/2009

Registration Date

24-Dec-2009

Court

Teghra CJM Division

Judge

1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ABSCONDER

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAPPI DEVI

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BUDDHAN SINGH AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SUBHADRA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found that the complaint was taken up for hearing and all three accused persons were absent. Since the accused persons failed to appear despite bail bonds being issued, the court cancelled their bail bonds dated 11.10.2025 and declared all three accused persons absconding, issuing permanent warrants for their arrest as per legal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  4. 21-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  5. 25-Jul-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  6. 02-May-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  7. 28-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  8. 22-Nov-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  9. 28-Aug-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  10. 14-May-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  11. 13-May-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  12. 08-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  13. 11-Oct-2023

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  14. 31-Jul-2023

    Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  15. 29-May-2023

    Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  16. 31-Mar-2023

    Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  17. 27-Jan-2023

    Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  18. 21-Oct-2022

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  19. 02-Aug-2022

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  20. 05-May-2022

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  21. 02-May-2022

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  22. 17-Dec-2021

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  23. 21-Aug-2021

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  24. 20-Aug-2021

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  25. 23-Apr-2021

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  26. 22-Feb-2021

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  27. 21-Oct-2020

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  28. 14-Aug-2020

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  29. 03-Jun-2020

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  30. 18-Mar-2020

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  31. 03-Jan-2020

    Evidence Before Charge

  32. 18-Oct-2019

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  33. 07-Aug-2019

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  34. 12-Jun-2019

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  35. 13-Mar-2019

    Evidence Before Charge

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  36. 28-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 22-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3269/2009

casestatus.in Summary

The court found that the complaint was taken up for hearing and all three accused persons were absent. Since the accused persons failed to appear despite bail bonds being issued, the court cancelled their bail bonds dated 11.10.2025 and declared all three accused persons absconding, issuing permanent warrants for their arrest as per legal procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case