TUNA DEVI vs RANJIT MAHTO AND OTHERS — 95/2007
Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRBE410001402007
Filing Number
95/2007
Filing Date
12-Dec-2018
Registration No
95/2007
Registration Date
12-Dec-2018
Court
Teghra CJM Division
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
06
Police Station
TEGHRA
Year
2007
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TUNA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.RANJIT MAHTO AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Ranjit Mahto and Chandani Devi) of all charges under IPC sections 352, 452, 341, 323, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce any witnesses or evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt, thereby invoking the principle that the benefit of doubt favors the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
24-Feb-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
03-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
09-Jan-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
05-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
01-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
17-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
03-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
02-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
04-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
22-Sep-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
04-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
28-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
14-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
26-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
10-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
09-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
12-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
19-Sep-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
20-May-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
10-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
23-Dec-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
05-Oct-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Aug-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
09-Jun-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
05-Apr-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
29-Jan-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
10-Nov-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
27-Aug-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
24-Jun-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
21-Apr-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
13-Feb-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Dec-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
25-Nov-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
13-Sep-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
16-Jul-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
30-Apr-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 95/2007
Summary The court acquitted both accused persons (Ranjit Mahto and Chandani Devi) of all charges under IPC sections 352, 452, 341, 323, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce any witnesses or evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt, thereby invoking the principle that the benefit of doubt favors the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts