TAJ NARAYAN SINGH vs KARU SAH AND OTHERS — 453/2004
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,325,353,427. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRBE410000232004
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
453/2004
Filing Date
05-12-2018
Registration No
453/2004
Registration Date
04-03-2004
Court
Teghra CJM Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
BACHHWARA
Year
2004
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TAJ NARAYAN SINGH
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
KARU SAH AND OTHERS
DIPAN SAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 10-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 01-08-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 27-06-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 09-05-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court order from ACJM, Teghra is handwritten in Hindi/Punjabi script and appears difficult to read with complete clarity. However, based on the visible portions, the order dated 26.09.24 concerns a matter between the State and a defendant. The document references proceedings and appears to contain directions regarding the case, though the specific outcome (bail granted/denied, adjournment, etc.) cannot be determined with certainty due to the handwriting quality and image resolution. SKIP - While not completely garbled, the handwritten script's legibility is sufficiently compromised that providing a definitive summary of the actual order would be unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court order from ACJM, Teghra is handwritten in Hindi/Punjabi script and appears difficult to read with complete clarity. However, based on the visible portions, the order dated 26.09.24 concerns a matter between the State and a defendant. The document references proceedings and appears to contain directions regarding the case, though the specific outcome (bail granted/denied, adjournment, etc.) cannot be determined with certainty due to the handwriting quality and image resolution. SKIP - While not completely garbled, the handwritten script's legibility is sufficiently compromised that providing a definitive summary of the actual order would be unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts