TAJ NARAYAN SINGH vs KARU SAH AND OTHERS — 453/2004

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,325,353,427. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRBE410000232004

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

453/2004

Filing Date

05-12-2018

Registration No

453/2004

Registration Date

04-03-2004

Court

Teghra CJM Division

Judge

1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

BACHHWARA

Year

2004

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,325,353,427

Petitioner(s)

TAJ NARAYAN SINGH

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

KARU SAH AND OTHERS

DIPAN SAH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE

10-12-2025

EVIDENCE

01-08-2025

EVIDENCE

27-06-2025

EVIDENCE

09-05-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

26-07-2024
Order

Case Summary The court order from ACJM, Teghra is handwritten in Hindi/Punjabi script and appears difficult to read with complete clarity. However, based on the visible portions, the order dated 26.09.24 concerns a matter between the State and a defendant. The document references proceedings and appears to contain directions regarding the case, though the specific outcome (bail granted/denied, adjournment, etc.) cannot be determined with certainty due to the handwriting quality and image resolution. SKIP - While not completely garbled, the handwritten script's legibility is sufficiently compromised that providing a definitive summary of the actual order would be unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court order from ACJM, Teghra is handwritten in Hindi/Punjabi script and appears difficult to read with complete clarity. However, based on the visible portions, the order dated 26.09.24 concerns a matter between the State and a defendant. The document references proceedings and appears to contain directions regarding the case, though the specific outcome (bail granted/denied, adjournment, etc.) cannot be determined with certainty due to the handwriting quality and image resolution. SKIP - While not completely garbled, the handwritten script's legibility is sufficiently compromised that providing a definitive summary of the actual order would be unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Teghra CJM Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case