TAJ NARAYAN SINGH vs KARU SAH AND OTHERS — 453/2004
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,325,353,427. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRBE410000232004
Filing Number
453/2004
Filing Date
05-Dec-2018
Registration No
453/2004
Registration Date
04-Mar-2004
Court
Teghra CJM Division
Judge
1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
BACHHWARA
Year
2004
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TAJ NARAYAN SINGH
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KARU SAH AND OTHERS
-
2.DIPAN SAH
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
09-May-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
26-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The court order from ACJM, Teghra is handwritten in Hindi/Punjabi script and appears difficult to read with complete clarity. However, based on the visible portions, the order dated 26.09.24 concerns a matter between the State and a defendant. The document references proceedings and appears to contain directions regarding the case, though the specific outcome (bail granted/denied, adjournment, etc.) cannot be determined with certainty due to the handwriting quality and image resolution. SKIP - While not completely garbled, the handwritten script's legibility is sufficiently compromised that providing a definitive summary of the actual order would be unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-May-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
29-Nov-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
18-Aug-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
07-Jun-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
22-Mar-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
23-Dec-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
22-Aug-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-Jul-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
01-Jun-2022
Evidence
-
08-Apr-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
14-Mar-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
02-Feb-2022
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
15-Dec-2021
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
17-Sep-2021
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
12-May-2021
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
26-Feb-2021
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
04-Nov-2020
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
26-Aug-2020
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
01-Jul-2020
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
29-Apr-2020
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
14-Feb-2020
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
06-Nov-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
21-Aug-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
31-May-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I
-
01-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 453/2004
Case Summary The court order from ACJM, Teghra is handwritten in Hindi/Punjabi script and appears difficult to read with complete clarity. However, based on the visible portions, the order dated 26.09.24 concerns a matter between the State and a defendant. The document references proceedings and appears to contain directions regarding the case, though the specific outcome (bail granted/denied, adjournment, etc.) cannot be determined with certainty due to the handwriting quality and image resolution. SKIP - While not completely garbled, the handwritten script's legibility is sufficiently compromised that providing a definitive summary of the actual order would be unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts