SHANKAR PANDIT vs RAM NANDAN PANDIT — 13998/2014

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: BRBE310004682014

Filing Number

13998/2014

Filing Date

27-May-2014

Registration No

13998/2014

Registration Date

27-May-2014

Court

Balia CJM Division

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,379
Witchcraft Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR PANDIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM NANDAN PANDIT

  2. 2.NAGESHWAR KUMAR

  3. 3.VIKASH LKUMAR

  4. 4.SUDHA DEVI

  5. 5.SANJAY PANDIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Court of Kiran Kumari Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai acquitted all five accused persons (Ram Nandan Pandit, Nageshwar Kumar, Sudha Devi, Vikash Kumar, and Sanjay Pandit) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 379, 504 and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dian Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions, absence of medical and documentary evidence, lack of independent corroboration, and strong probability of false implication arising from prior enmity and a land dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  13. 07-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  15. 27-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  16. 17-Oct-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  17. 19-Sep-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  18. 23-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  19. 09-Jun-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  20. 08-Jun-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  21. 18-Mar-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  22. 21-Jan-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  23. 02-Dec-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  24. 17-Oct-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  25. 26-Sep-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  26. 20-Sep-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  27. 06-Sep-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  28. 28-Jun-2024

    Defence Evidence

  29. 15-Apr-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  30. 06-Feb-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  31. 29-Nov-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  32. 04-Sep-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  33. 04-Aug-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  34. 03-Jul-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  35. 18-May-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  36. 18-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  37. 22-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  38. 15-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  39. 11-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  40. 31-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  41. 25-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  42. 06-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  43. 25-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 27-May-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13998/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Court of Kiran Kumari Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai acquitted all five accused persons (Ram Nandan Pandit, Nageshwar Kumar, Sudha Devi, Vikash Kumar, and Sanjay Pandit) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 379, 504 and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dian Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions, absence of medical and documentary evidence, lack of independent corroboration, and strong probability of false implication arising from prior enmity and a land dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case