SHANKAR PANDIT vs RAM NANDAN PANDIT — 13998/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,379,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRBE310004682014
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13998/2014
Filing Date
27-05-2014
Registration No
13998/2014
Registration Date
27-05-2014
Court
Balia CJM Division
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHANKAR PANDIT
Respondent(s)
RAM NANDAN PANDIT
NAGESHWAR KUMAR
VIKASH LKUMAR
SUDHA DEVI
SANJAY PANDIT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Disposed
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Court of Kiran Kumari Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai acquitted all five accused persons (Ram Nandan Pandit, Nageshwar Kumar, Sudha Devi, Vikash Kumar, and Sanjay Pandit) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 379, 504 and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dian Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions, absence of medical and documentary evidence, lack of independent corroboration, and strong probability of false implication arising from prior enmity and a land dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Court of Kiran Kumari Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai acquitted all five accused persons (Ram Nandan Pandit, Nageshwar Kumar, Sudha Devi, Vikash Kumar, and Sanjay Pandit) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 379, 504 and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dian Act. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to material contradictions, absence of medical and documentary evidence, lack of independent corroboration, and strong probability of false implication arising from prior enmity and a land dispute between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts