SANJIT KUMAR SINHA vs KARE LAL SINGH — 2394/2010

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,419. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRBE310002472010

Filing Number

2394/2010

Filing Date

09-Jul-2010

Registration No

2394/2010

Registration Date

13-Dec-2018

Court

Balia CJM Division

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

155

Police Station

SAHEBPUR KAMAL

Year

2010

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354,419

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJIT KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARE LAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court acquitted accused Karelal Singh (also referred to as Karelal Yadav) of charges under IPC Section 354/419 due to lack of evidence. The prosecution failed to adduce any witnesses despite ample opportunities and clear instructions, with the informant himself not appearing as a witness, leaving no incriminating material on record. The bail bonds of the accused and sureties were also discharged accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  9. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  10. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  11. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  12. 18-Mar-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  13. 07-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  14. 13-Dec-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  15. 27-Nov-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  16. 27-Aug-2024

    Appearence

  17. 15-Jun-2024

    Appearence

  18. 16-Mar-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  19. 12-Jan-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  20. 18-Oct-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  21. 11-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  22. 09-Jun-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  23. 16-Mar-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I

  24. 30-Nov-2022

    Appearence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  25. 28-Jul-2022

    Appearence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  26. 30-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  27. 05-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  28. 29-Oct-2021

    Evidence

  29. 15-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  30. 23-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  31. 19-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  32. 03-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  33. 27-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  34. 10-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  35. 20-Mar-2020

    Evidence

  36. 20-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  37. 27-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  38. 06-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  39. 01-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  40. 23-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I

  41. 13-Feb-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 09-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2394/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court acquitted accused Karelal Singh (also referred to as Karelal Yadav) of charges under IPC Section 354/419 due to lack of evidence. The prosecution failed to adduce any witnesses despite ample opportunities and clear instructions, with the informant himself not appearing as a witness, leaving no incriminating material on record. The bail bonds of the accused and sureties were also discharged accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case