GANESH PRASAD SHARMA vs GAYA DEVI AND OTHERS — 1768/2005
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 145,147,323,342,504,469,471. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRBE310000862005
Filing Number
1768/2005
Filing Date
19-Sep-2005
Registration No
1768/2005
Registration Date
12-Dec-2018
Court
Balia CJM Division
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANESH PRASAD SHARMA
Adv. pp
Respondent(s)
-
1.GAYA DEVI AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
The court acquitted accused Manoj Sharma and Yogi Yadav of all charges under IPC Sections 147, 323, 342, 504, 469, and 471, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment noted that the evidence suffered from material inconsistencies, lack of corroboration, absence of medical evidence to support assault allegations, and improper documentary proof regarding the alleged forged land documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
18-Feb-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Feb-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
28-Jan-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-Jan-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
13-Jan-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
17-Dec-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
26-Nov-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Nov-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Nov-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-Oct-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
23-Sep-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
13-Aug-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Aug-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
02-Aug-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
07-Jul-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
30-Jun-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
17-Jun-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
04-Jun-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
26-May-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
15-May-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
03-May-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
17-Apr-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
26-Mar-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
20-Mar-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Mar-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
21-Feb-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
19-Feb-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Feb-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
16-Jan-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
17-Dec-2024
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
23-Nov-2024
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
22-Aug-2024
Arguments
-
12-Jun-2024
Arguments
-
19-Mar-2024
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Mar-2024
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
20-Feb-2024
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
12-Dec-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
02-Nov-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
06-Oct-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
25-Sep-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
29-Aug-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
16-Aug-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
13-Jun-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
19-May-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
18-Apr-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
27-Jan-2023
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class-I
-
21-Jan-2023
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
20-Dec-2022
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
21-Nov-2022
Order
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
01-Nov-2022
Hearing
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
14-Sep-2022
Hearing
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
24-Aug-2022
Hearing
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Jul-2022
Hearing
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
01-Jul-2022
Hearing
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
08-Jun-2022
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
24-May-2022
Hearing
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
09-May-2022
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Apr-2022
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Mar-2022
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Mar-2022
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
03-Mar-2022
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
28-Feb-2022
Arguments
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
31-Jan-2022
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
27-Oct-2021
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
-
21-Aug-2021
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
-
15-Jul-2021
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Apr-2021
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
01-Mar-2021
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
29-Jan-2021
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
04-Nov-2020
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Aug-2020
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
19-May-2020
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
-
18-Mar-2020
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
-
26-Feb-2020
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
06-Feb-2020
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
23-Dec-2019
Evidence
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
25-Nov-2019
Evidence
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
24-Nov-2019
Evidence
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
15-Oct-2019
Evidence
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
18-Sep-2019
Evidence
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
18-Jul-2019
Evidence
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
22-Jun-2019
Evidence
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
11-Apr-2019
Evidence
Addl Cheif Judicial Magistrate I
-
05-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2005
Case filed
Registration No. 1768/2005
The court acquitted accused Manoj Sharma and Yogi Yadav of all charges under IPC Sections 147, 323, 342, 504, 469, and 471, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment noted that the evidence suffered from material inconsistencies, lack of corroboration, absence of medical evidence to support assault allegations, and improper documentary proof regarding the alleged forged land documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts