ANANDI YADAV AND OTHERS vs MOST. RAJ KUMARI DEVI AND OTHERS — 21/2016
Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBE220000022016
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
21/2016
Filing Date
12-05-2016
Registration No
21/2016
Registration Date
12-05-2016
Court
Bakhri Civil Division
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Petitioner(s)
ANANDI YADAV AND OTHERS
RAMCHARITAR YADAV
MAHESHWAR YADAV
BALESHWAR YADAV
MAHENDRA YADAV
UPENDRA YADAV
Respondent(s)
MOST. RAJ KUMARI DEVI AND OTHERS
BIRJU YADAV
RAM UJAGAR YADAV
SHIV SHANKAR YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 17-10-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 27-08-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Sub-Judge, Bakhri rejected the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction (dated 14.06.2022) in a land dispute case (T.S. 21/2016). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, the balance of convenience favored the defendants (who purchased the land through a registered sale deed and were constructing a house), and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. The case is adjourned to 22.11.2022 for plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sub-Judge, Bakhri rejected the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction (dated 14.06.2022) in a land dispute case (T.S. 21/2016). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, the balance of convenience favored the defendants (who purchased the land through a registered sale deed and were constructing a house), and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. The case is adjourned to 22.11.2022 for plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts