ANANDI YADAV AND OTHERS vs MOST. RAJ KUMARI DEVI AND OTHERS — 21/2016
Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBE220000022016
Filing Number
21/2016
Filing Date
12-May-2016
Registration No
21/2016
Registration Date
12-May-2016
Court
Bakhri Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANANDI YADAV AND OTHERS
-
2.RAMCHARITAR YADAV
-
3.MAHESHWAR YADAV
-
4.BALESHWAR YADAV
-
5.MAHENDRA YADAV
-
6.UPENDRA YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOST. RAJ KUMARI DEVI AND OTHERS
-
2.BIRJU YADAV
-
3.RAM UJAGAR YADAV
-
4.SHIV SHANKAR YADAV
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
27-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
16-Aug-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
21-May-2024
Evidence
-
09-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
18-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
29-Nov-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
06-Jun-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
01-May-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
28-Feb-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
10-Jan-2023
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Dec-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
22-Nov-2022
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
12-Sep-2022
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Sub-Judge, Bakhri rejected the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction (dated 14.06.2022) in a land dispute case (T.S. 21/2016). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, the balance of convenience favored the defendants (who purchased the land through a registered sale deed and were constructing a house), and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. The case is adjourned to 22.11.2022 for plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
01-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
30-Aug-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
16-Jul-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
14-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
02-Jun-2022
Appearence
-
25-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
04-Mar-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
11-Jan-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
04-Jan-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
20-Dec-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
16-Nov-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
06-Sep-2021
Appearence
-
01-Jul-2021
Appearence
-
12-May-2021
Appearence
-
09-Mar-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
15-Feb-2021
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
03-Dec-2020
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
08-Sep-2020
Appearence
-
14-Jul-2020
Appearence
-
02-Jun-2020
Appearence
-
21-Oct-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
20-Sep-2019
OrderView PDF
-
20-Sep-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
20-Aug-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
01-Aug-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
19-Jun-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-May-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
30-Apr-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
27-Mar-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
05-Mar-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
12-Feb-2019
Appearence
Sub Judge
-
21-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-May-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2016
Summary: The Sub-Judge, Bakhri rejected the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction (dated 14.06.2022) in a land dispute case (T.S. 21/2016). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, the balance of convenience favored the defendants (who purchased the land through a registered sale deed and were constructing a house), and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. The case is adjourned to 22.11.2022 for plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts