KEBLA DEVI AND OTHERS vs JANKI DEVI AND OTHERS — 159/1993
Status: ORDER. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBE220000011993
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
159/1993
Filing Date
19-10-1993
Registration No
159/1993
Registration Date
19-10-1993
Court
Bakhri Civil Division
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE
Petitioner(s)
KEBLA DEVI AND OTHERS
Respondent(s)
JANKI DEVI AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | ORDER | |
| 16-04-2026 | ORDER | |
| 15-04-2026 | ORDER | |
| 13-04-2026 | ORDER | |
| 10-04-2026 | ORDER |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Title Suit No. 159/1993 | Sub-Judge-I, Bakhri, Begusarai Parties: Kewala Devi & Ors. (Plaintiffs) vs. Janaki Devi & Ors. (Defendants) Order Date: 19.11.25 Outcome: The court rejected/dismissed two applications filed on 25.06.25 by substituted defendants (Nos. 36(a), 36(b), 36(c), and 36(d)) seeking to (1) remove their names from the suit and (2) discharge them as defendants. The court found these applications legally unjustifiable, time-barred, and lacking proper substantiation. The court also rejected an earlier application by defendant No. 49 (Anil Mahto) seeking to become an intervening defendant, finding no proper legal basis for his involvement in the land dispute case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Title Suit No. 159/1993 | Sub-Judge-I, Bakhri, Begusarai Parties: Kewala Devi & Ors. (Plaintiffs) vs. Janaki Devi & Ors. (Defendants) Order Date: 19.11.25 Outcome: The court rejected/dismissed two applications filed on 25.06.25 by substituted defendants (Nos. 36(a), 36(b), 36(c), and 36(d)) seeking to (1) remove their names from the suit and (2) discharge them as defendants. The court found these applications legally unjustifiable, time-barred, and lacking proper substantiation. The court also rejected an earlier application by defendant No. 49 (Anil Mahto) seeking to become an intervening defendant, finding no proper legal basis for his involvement in the land dispute case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts